[NA-Discuss] When a Registry goes Rogue
In the context of discussions about new gTLDs, we need to talk about the malicious practices of old gTLDs in order to avoid making the same set of mistakes with the new batch of TLDs. Let's consider the .travel TLD.
After putting in place a bulk purchase program this registry went private. It then registered through namesbeyond.com 164,708 domains (normally going for $99 at retail) at an insider unit price of $4.09 and proceeded to monetize this namespace.
Of course, there are acceptable forms of monetization, and then there are those forms which can only be described as cybersquatting. WIPO has recently ruled that "many of the domain names it has registered are well-known trademarks, thus evidencing a clear pattern of abusive domain name registration." -- see http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2008/d2008-1161.html
So now we have a registry operator apparently engaged in cybersquatting.
What has this experience taught us?
1. Neither registry operators nor their subsidiaries, affiliates, or other related shell corporations should be permitted to register domain names unless such registrations comport with narrowly drafted guidelines.
2. Registry ownership can change. You might think that you are approving an applicant's bona fides, yet the applicant's undisclosed intent is to immediately turn over the registry operation/management to another entity upon receipt of the delegation. You might think that you are approving an application on the part of a publicly-listed firm, only to see shenanigans start when the firm thereafter goes private. Changes in ownership should require some type of re-accreditation/re-certification or ICANN-approval process.
3. Cybersquatting on the part of registries and/or registrars should be punishable through a sanctions program. When contracted parties go off the deep end, the community needs to be protected.
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------

[NA-Discuss] When a Registry goes Rogue
> Subsequently, the globe.com sold out to Labitrav LLC which then changed its corporate name to Labigroup Holdings LLC.
All of these recent changes at .TRAVEL are just paper shuffling, since
these companies are all controlled by the same guy, Michael Egan, who made
a lot of money in the car rental business and has been losing it on a
bunch of impressively bad Internet businesses ever since. I think that
theglobe.com, which ejected Tralliance seconds before it went down the
drain still holds the record for the largest CAN SPAM fine ever paid for
illegal spamming.
I agree that Tralliance needs some serious supervision from ICANN. In my
personal experience, when I registered airinfo.travel for my little air
ticket web site, one of their salesmen immediately wrote and tried to
upsell me a bunch of other domains including skyauction.travel, an obvious
squat.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------
[NA-Discuss] When a Registry goes Rogue
On a follow-up to Jacqueline's query:
When Hostway's subsidiary purchased the register.com registryPro subsidiary in order to manage the .pro registry an "assignment" ratified by the ICANN was required. I would have to wonder why the purchase of Trailliance by the globe.com did not similarly require an ICANN-approved "assignment". Perhaps someone on Staff can offer a clarification...
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------