[ALAC] [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Track Proposal v3
Hello,
While incorporating comments in the draft comment statement, in the context
of "ALAC raises the following comments with a view to contribute to the
process of evolving the Plan further as a complete Plan so as to ensure that
IDN TLDs are smoothly implemented globally without technical or policy
related implementation issues and seamlessly integrated in the domain name
system. At the same time ALAC empathizes that all that needs to be examined
needs to be examined expeditiously as expressed in the opinion within that
'Fast-track IDN ccTLDs must be implemented as planned, i.e. in Q4 of 2009 as
the latest, to meet the "pressing need" of non-ASCII user community", I have
added the following statement contextually.
"With the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full
day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
The statement with changes is at page
https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy. Apart from
non-substantive, structural changes in the process of merging comments with
the original draft comment statement, the above addition related to focused
inter-constituency meetings on IDN TLDs at the next ICANN meeting is an
important addition that DID NOT form part of the draft comment while it was
open for alac comments during the last 7 days. Added contextually to
reconcile the need for urgency and the necessity for the required further
work.
I hope this is permissible post comment period, and be accepted as part of
the statement to vote.
Thank you.
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello CLO,
>
> I have incorporate the comments and prepared a more concise comment as the
> ALAC comment on the 3rd revision of the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN
> ccTLDs. This is at page
> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy.
>
> By a copy of this message to staff I am requesting that this may please be
> copied to the alac docs page and anywhere else as may be required or emailed
> to initiate the voting process.
>
> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mathias,
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Will work on this today. And send you a revision incorporating comments in
>> a few hours.
>>
>>
>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>>
>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthias Langenegger <
>> matthias.langenegger@icann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Siva,
>>>
>>> According to the At-Large Policy Development schedule, the final draft of
>>> the At-Large Comment on the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD Fast
>>> Track Process Revision 3 is due today. Did you receive a response to your
>>> Email from Wednesday and did you have a chance to revise the Draft
>>> Statement? As soon as we receive the final Draft Statement from you we will
>>> start the ALAC vote on the document.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias Langenegger
>>> At-Large Coordination Officer
>>> Internet Association for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>> Phone: +41 79 644 65 35
>>> Skype: matthiaslangenegger
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [
>>> idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian
>>> Muthusamy [isolatedn@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:21 AM
>>> To: ALAC Internal List
>>> Cc: Bart Boswinkel; Tina Dam; idn-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Track
>>> Proposal v3
>>>
>>> Hello CLO
>>>
>>> The revised draft incorporating comments is due tomorrow (9th July) and
>>> the
>>> statement has to go to alac vote tomorrow. Apart from incorporating
>>> comments, should any of the nine points need to be DELETED ?
>>>
>>> Please advise.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello Tina
>>> >
>>> > The points raised in point 7,8,9 in the ALAC draft comment in
>>> reference to
>>> > the absence of links to documents etc. are general, minor observations,
>>> and
>>> > to be taken as a suggestion for maintaining the completeness of the
>>> draft
>>> > implementation report. It was NOT implied that this is a serious
>>> omission,
>>> > nor implied that there was any reason for any intent.
>>> >
>>> > The draft comments may please NOT be seen as directed to IDN staff, and
>>> > certainly there was no misunderstanding about staff / working groups
>>> that
>>> > would have compiled the third revison of the plan on which the draft
>>> > comments were prepared.
>>> >
>>> > Thank you
>>> > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>> > IDN liaision.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart <
>>> > nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Dear IDN Working Group and ALAC members:
>>> >>
>>> >> Tina Dan at ICANN had a look at the draft statement, and thought I
>>> should
>>> >> advise you of the following, which she thinks may be a
>>> misunderstanding:
>>> >>
>>> >> In 7-8-9, where it appears the ALAC is understanding the Module 7
>>> revision
>>> >> to be that there are no outstanding issues. In fact all outstanding
>>> issues
>>> >> related to financial considerations, relationship between ICANN and
>>> manager,
>>> >> and variant management are still outstanding, hence the supporting
>>> papers.
>>> >> We simply provided supporting papers as opposed to keeping these long
>>> >> discussions in Module 7.
>>> >> It is correct that we did not add link to the supporting papers in the
>>> >> Draft Implementation Plan. This was difficult to do because of the
>>> posting
>>> >> deadlines and instead we posted all papers together at:
>>> >> http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm
>>> >> I hope this is of use to you. Of course if you have any questions
>>> related
>>> >> to the above, I'm sure Tina would be happy to help.
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Nick Ashton-Hart
>>> >>
>>> >> Director for At-Large
>>> >>
>>> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>> >>
>>> >> Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88
>>> >>
>>> >> USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637
>>> >>
>>> >> Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44
>>> >>
>>> >> Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68
>>> >>
>>> >> email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
>>> >>
>>> >> Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
>>> Skype:
>>> >> nashtonhart
>>> >>
>>> >> Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> ALAC-Internal mailing list
>>> >> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
>>> >>
>>> >> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>>> >> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IDN-WG mailing list
>>> IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>
>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.ica...
>>>
>>> IDN WG Wiki:
>>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac

[ALAC] [ALAC-Internal] [IDN-WG] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Trac
Staff should prepare the vote to go as based on the ORIGINAL version that
was out for internal comment i.e. WITHOUT the "With the view to
expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full
day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
What we can do to encourage focus on, and commitment to, implementation as
a main theme at the Seoul meeting is to put such a proposal into the
introduction and cover message sent with the reviewed and voted on text...
Particularly as the author of a draft statement Suva we must avoid the
temptation of adding more text just prior to a vote process lest the whole
thing end up being delayed if objections are raised... I can however state
the additional text as a recommendation or proposal from our IDN Liaison
(with whatever support or modification the ALAC wishes to give to it) as an
annex to rather than part of the endorsed for vote statement text)
Apologies for any lack of context, conciseness or grammar here but I'm on
some major pain killers at the moment after minor surgery and have sat too
long looking at my email...
Vanda as Acting ALAC Chair at the moment if this makes no sense to you and
the others please over-ride or alter till it does but we need to get the
VOTE started ASAP to stay on schedule...
CLO
2009/7/10 Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> Hello,
>
> While incorporating comments in the draft comment statement, in the context
> of "ALAC raises the following comments with a view to contribute to the
> process of evolving the Plan further as a complete Plan so as to ensure
> that
> IDN TLDs are smoothly implemented globally without technical or policy
> related implementation issues and seamlessly integrated in the domain name
> system. At the same time ALAC empathizes that all that needs to be examined
> needs to be examined expeditiously as expressed in the opinion within that
> 'Fast-track IDN ccTLDs must be implemented as planned, i.e. in Q4 of 2009
> as
> the latest, to meet the "pressing need" of non-ASCII user community", I
> have
> added the following statement contextually.
>
> "With the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
> proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full
> day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
> attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
> pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
>
> The statement with changes is at page
> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy. Apart from
> non-substantive, structural changes in the process of merging comments with
> the original draft comment statement, the above addition related to focused
> inter-constituency meetings on IDN TLDs at the next ICANN meeting is an
> important addition that DID NOT form part of the draft comment while it was
> open for alac comments during the last 7 days. Added contextually to
> reconcile the need for urgency and the necessity for the required further
> work.
>
> I hope this is permissible post comment period, and be accepted as part of
> the statement to vote.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello CLO,
> >
> > I have incorporate the comments and prepared a more concise comment as
> the
> > ALAC comment on the 3rd revision of the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN
> > ccTLDs. This is at page
> > https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy.
> >
> > By a copy of this message to staff I am requesting that this may please
> be
> > copied to the alac docs page and anywhere else as may be required or
> emailed
> > to initiate the voting process.
> >
> > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> > isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Mathias,
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Will work on this today. And send you a revision incorporating comments
> in
> >> a few hours.
> >>
> >>
> >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> >> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
> >>
> >> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> >> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> >> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthias Langenegger <
> >> matthias.langenegger@icann.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Siva,
> >>>
> >>> According to the At-Large Policy Development schedule, the final draft
> of
> >>> the At-Large Comment on the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD
> Fast
> >>> Track Process Revision 3 is due today. Did you receive a response to
> your
> >>> Email from Wednesday and did you have a chance to revise the Draft
> >>> Statement? As soon as we receive the final Draft Statement from you we
> will
> >>> start the ALAC vote on the document.
> >>>
> >>> Kind Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Matthias Langenegger
> >>> At-Large Coordination Officer
> >>> Internet Association for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> >>> Phone: +41 79 644 65 35
> >>> Skype: matthiaslangenegger
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________________
> >>> From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [
> >>> idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian
> >>> Muthusamy [isolatedn@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:21 AM
> >>> To: ALAC Internal List
> >>> Cc: Bart Boswinkel; Tina Dam; idn-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Track
> >>> Proposal v3
> >>>
> >>> Hello CLO
> >>>
> >>> The revised draft incorporating comments is due tomorrow (9th July) and
> >>> the
> >>> statement has to go to alac vote tomorrow. Apart from incorporating
> >>> comments, should any of the nine points need to be DELETED ?
> >>>
> >>> Please advise.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> >>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> >>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> >>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> >>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hello Tina
> >>> >
> >>> > The points raised in point 7,8,9 in the ALAC draft comment in
> >>> reference to
> >>> > the absence of links to documents etc. are general, minor
> observations,
> >>> and
> >>> > to be taken as a suggestion for maintaining the completeness of the
> >>> draft
> >>> > implementation report. It was NOT implied that this is a serious
> >>> omission,
> >>> > nor implied that there was any reason for any intent.
> >>> >
> >>> > The draft comments may please NOT be seen as directed to IDN staff,
> and
> >>> > certainly there was no misunderstanding about staff / working groups
> >>> that
> >>> > would have compiled the third revison of the plan on which the draft
> >>> > comments were prepared.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thank you
> >>> > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> >>> > IDN liaision.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart <
> >>> > nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Dear IDN Working Group and ALAC members:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Tina Dan at ICANN had a look at the draft statement, and thought I
> >>> should
> >>> >> advise you of the following, which she thinks may be a
> >>> misunderstanding:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> In 7-8-9, where it appears the ALAC is understanding the Module 7
> >>> revision
> >>> >> to be that there are no outstanding issues. In fact all outstanding
> >>> issues
> >>> >> related to financial considerations, relationship between ICANN and
> >>> manager,
> >>> >> and variant management are still outstanding, hence the supporting
> >>> papers.
> >>> >> We simply provided supporting papers as opposed to keeping these
> long
> >>> >> discussions in Module 7.
> >>> >> It is correct that we did not add link to the supporting papers in
> the
> >>> >> Draft Implementation Plan. This was difficult to do because of the
> >>> posting
> >>> >> deadlines and instead we posted all papers together at:
> >>> >> http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm
> >>> >> I hope this is of use to you. Of course if you have any questions
> >>> related
> >>> >> to the above, I'm sure Tina would be happy to help.
> >>> >> --
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards,
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Nick Ashton-Hart
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Director for At-Large
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88
> >>> >>
> >>> >> USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68
> >>> >>
> >>> >> email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
> >>> Skype:
> >>> >> nashtonhart
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> ALAC-Internal mailing list
> >>> >> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> >>> >> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> IDN-WG mailing list
> >>> IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>>
> >>>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.ica...
> >>>
> >>> IDN WG Wiki:
> >>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-Internal mailing list
> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
>
> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
[ALAC] [ALAC-Internal] [IDN-WG] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Trac
Hello CLO,
Please include as annex to the alac comment, the additional statement "With
the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is proposed
that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full day of
meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings attended
by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all pending
issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation" as as a
recommendation or proposal from our IDN Liaison, as indicated by you
earlier. I feel that focused discussion on IDN at the Seoul meeting could
help expedite IDN implmentation.
Thank you
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> Staff should prepare the vote to go as based on the ORIGINAL version that
> was out for internal comment i.e. WITHOUT the "With the view to
> expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
> proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full
> day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
> attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
> pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
>
>
> What we can do to encourage focus on, and commitment to, implementation as
> a main theme at the Seoul meeting is to put such a proposal into the
> introduction and cover message sent with the reviewed and voted on text...
> Particularly as the author of a draft statement Suva we must avoid the
> temptation of adding more text just prior to a vote process lest the whole
> thing end up being delayed if objections are raised... I can however state
> the additional text as a recommendation or proposal from our IDN Liaison
> (with whatever support or modification the ALAC wishes to give to it) as an
> annex to rather than part of the endorsed for vote statement text)
>
> Apologies for any lack of context, conciseness or grammar here but I'm on
> some major pain killers at the moment after minor surgery and have sat too
> long looking at my email...
>
> Vanda as Acting ALAC Chair at the moment if this makes no sense to you and
> the others please over-ride or alter till it does but we need to get the
> VOTE started ASAP to stay on schedule...
>
> CLO
>
>
>
> 2009/7/10 Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > While incorporating comments in the draft comment statement, in the
> context
> > of "ALAC raises the following comments with a view to contribute to the
> > process of evolving the Plan further as a complete Plan so as to ensure
> > that
> > IDN TLDs are smoothly implemented globally without technical or policy
> > related implementation issues and seamlessly integrated in the domain
> name
> > system. At the same time ALAC empathizes that all that needs to be
> examined
> > needs to be examined expeditiously as expressed in the opinion within
> that
> > 'Fast-track IDN ccTLDs must be implemented as planned, i.e. in Q4 of 2009
> > as
> > the latest, to meet the "pressing need" of non-ASCII user community", I
> > have
> > added the following statement contextually.
> >
> > "With the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
> > proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a
> full
> > day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency
> meetings
> > attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
> > pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
> >
> > The statement with changes is at page
> > https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy. Apart
> from
> > non-substantive, structural changes in the process of merging comments
> with
> > the original draft comment statement, the above addition related to
> focused
> > inter-constituency meetings on IDN TLDs at the next ICANN meeting is an
> > important addition that DID NOT form part of the draft comment while it
> was
> > open for alac comments during the last 7 days. Added contextually to
> > reconcile the need for urgency and the necessity for the required further
> > work.
> >
> > I hope this is permissible post comment period, and be accepted as part
> of
> > the statement to vote.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> > isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello CLO,
> > >
> > > I have incorporate the comments and prepared a more concise comment as
> > the
> > > ALAC comment on the 3rd revision of the Draft Implementation Plan for
> IDN
> > > ccTLDs. This is at page
> > > https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy.
> > >
> > > By a copy of this message to staff I am requesting that this may please
> > be
> > > copied to the alac docs page and anywhere else as may be required or
> > emailed
> > > to initiate the voting process.
> > >
> > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> > > isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Mathias,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >>
> > >> Will work on this today. And send you a revision incorporating
> comments
> > in
> > >> a few hours.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> > >> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
> > >>
> > >> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> > >> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> > >> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthias Langenegger <
> > >> matthias.langenegger@icann.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Siva,
> > >>>
> > >>> According to the At-Large Policy Development schedule, the final
> draft
> > of
> > >>> the At-Large Comment on the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD
> > Fast
> > >>> Track Process Revision 3 is due today. Did you receive a response to
> > your
> > >>> Email from Wednesday and did you have a chance to revise the Draft
> > >>> Statement? As soon as we receive the final Draft Statement from you
> we
> > will
> > >>> start the ALAC vote on the document.
> > >>>
> > >>> Kind Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Matthias Langenegger
> > >>> At-Large Coordination Officer
> > >>> Internet Association for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> > >>> Phone: +41 79 644 65 35
> > >>> Skype: matthiaslangenegger
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________________
> > >>> From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [
> > >>> idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian
> > >>> Muthusamy [isolatedn@gmail.com]
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:21 AM
> > >>> To: ALAC Internal List
> > >>> Cc: Bart Boswinkel; Tina Dam; idn-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Statement on IDN Fast
> Track
> > >>> Proposal v3
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello CLO
> > >>>
> > >>> The revised draft incorporating comments is due tomorrow (9th July)
> and
> > >>> the
> > >>> statement has to go to alac vote tomorrow. Apart from incorporating
> > >>> comments, should any of the nine points need to be DELETED ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Please advise.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> > >>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
> > >>>
> > >>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> > >>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> > >>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
> > >>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hello Tina
> > >>> >
> > >>> > The points raised in point 7,8,9 in the ALAC draft comment in
> > >>> reference to
> > >>> > the absence of links to documents etc. are general, minor
> > observations,
> > >>> and
> > >>> > to be taken as a suggestion for maintaining the completeness of the
> > >>> draft
> > >>> > implementation report. It was NOT implied that this is a serious
> > >>> omission,
> > >>> > nor implied that there was any reason for any intent.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > The draft comments may please NOT be seen as directed to IDN staff,
> > and
> > >>> > certainly there was no misunderstanding about staff / working
> groups
> > >>> that
> > >>> > would have compiled the third revison of the plan on which the
> draft
> > >>> > comments were prepared.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thank you
> > >>> > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> > >>> > IDN liaision.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart <
> > >>> > nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> Dear IDN Working Group and ALAC members:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Tina Dan at ICANN had a look at the draft statement, and thought I
> > >>> should
> > >>> >> advise you of the following, which she thinks may be a
> > >>> misunderstanding:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> In 7-8-9, where it appears the ALAC is understanding the Module 7
> > >>> revision
> > >>> >> to be that there are no outstanding issues. In fact all
> outstanding
> > >>> issues
> > >>> >> related to financial considerations, relationship between ICANN
> and
> > >>> manager,
> > >>> >> and variant management are still outstanding, hence the supporting
> > >>> papers.
> > >>> >> We simply provided supporting papers as opposed to keeping these
> > long
> > >>> >> discussions in Module 7.
> > >>> >> It is correct that we did not add link to the supporting papers in
> > the
> > >>> >> Draft Implementation Plan. This was difficult to do because of the
> > >>> posting
> > >>> >> deadlines and instead we posted all papers together at:
> > >>> >> http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm
> > >>> >> I hope this is of use to you. Of course if you have any questions
> > >>> related
> > >>> >> to the above, I'm sure Tina would be happy to help.
> > >>> >> --
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> --
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Regards,
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Nick Ashton-Hart
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Director for At-Large
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com/
> > >>> Skype:
> > >>> >> nashtonhart
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >> ALAC-Internal mailing list
> > >>> >> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> > >>> >> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> IDN-WG mailing list
> > >>> IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.ica...
> > >>>
> > >>> IDN WG Wiki:
> > >>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC-Internal mailing list
> > ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
> >
> > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> > At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >
>
>
>
[ALAC] [ALAC-Internal] [IDN-WG] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Trac
As i have posted my comments in the Wiki, i think this statement is very
long and could be summarized, specially the point of the IDN ccTLD ICANN
processing cost.
I don't think it captured the comments done myself or others in the wiki.
Regards,
Mohamed
Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> Staff should prepare the vote to go as based on the ORIGINAL version that
> was out for internal comment i.e. WITHOUT the "With the view to
> expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
> proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full
> day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
> attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
> pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
>
>
> What we can do to encourage focus on, and commitment to, implementation as
> a main theme at the Seoul meeting is to put such a proposal into the
> introduction and cover message sent with the reviewed and voted on text...
> Particularly as the author of a draft statement Suva we must avoid the
> temptation of adding more text just prior to a vote process lest the whole
> thing end up being delayed if objections are raised... I can however state
> the additional text as a recommendation or proposal from our IDN Liaison
> (with whatever support or modification the ALAC wishes to give to it) as an
> annex to rather than part of the endorsed for vote statement text)
>
> Apologies for any lack of context, conciseness or grammar here but I'm on
> some major pain killers at the moment after minor surgery and have sat too
> long looking at my email...
>
> Vanda as Acting ALAC Chair at the moment if this makes no sense to you and
> the others please over-ride or alter till it does but we need to get the
> VOTE started ASAP to stay on schedule...
>
> CLO
>
>
>
> 2009/7/10 Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> While incorporating comments in the draft comment statement, in the context
>> of "ALAC raises the following comments with a view to contribute to the
>> process of evolving the Plan further as a complete Plan so as to ensure
>> that
>> IDN TLDs are smoothly implemented globally without technical or policy
>> related implementation issues and seamlessly integrated in the domain name
>> system. At the same time ALAC empathizes that all that needs to be examined
>> needs to be examined expeditiously as expressed in the opinion within that
>> 'Fast-track IDN ccTLDs must be implemented as planned, i.e. in Q4 of 2009
>> as
>> the latest, to meet the "pressing need" of non-ASCII user community", I
>> have
>> added the following statement contextually.
>>
>> "With the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
>> proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a full
>> day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
>> attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
>> pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
>>
>> The statement with changes is at page
>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy. Apart from
>> non-substantive, structural changes in the process of merging comments with
>> the original draft comment statement, the above addition related to focused
>> inter-constituency meetings on IDN TLDs at the next ICANN meeting is an
>> important addition that DID NOT form part of the draft comment while it was
>> open for alac comments during the last 7 days. Added contextually to
>> reconcile the need for urgency and the necessity for the required further
>> work.
>>
>> I hope this is permissible post comment period, and be accepted as part of
>> the statement to vote.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello CLO,
>>>
>>> I have incorporate the comments and prepared a more concise comment as
>>>
>> the
>>
>>> ALAC comment on the 3rd revision of the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN
>>> ccTLDs. This is at page
>>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy.
>>>
>>> By a copy of this message to staff I am requesting that this may please
>>>
>> be
>>
>>> copied to the alac docs page and anywhere else as may be required or
>>>
>> emailed
>>
>>> to initiate the voting process.
>>>
>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Mathias,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Will work on this today. And send you a revision incorporating comments
>>>>
>> in
>>
>>>> a few hours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>>>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>>>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthias Langenegger <
>>>> matthias.langenegger@icann.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Siva,
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the At-Large Policy Development schedule, the final draft
>>>>>
>> of
>>
>>>>> the At-Large Comment on the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD
>>>>>
>> Fast
>>
>>>>> Track Process Revision 3 is due today. Did you receive a response to
>>>>>
>> your
>>
>>>>> Email from Wednesday and did you have a chance to revise the Draft
>>>>> Statement? As soon as we receive the final Draft Statement from you we
>>>>>
>> will
>>
>>>>> start the ALAC vote on the document.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias Langenegger
>>>>> At-Large Coordination Officer
>>>>> Internet Association for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>> Phone: +41 79 644 65 35
>>>>> Skype: matthiaslangenegger
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [
>>>>> idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian
>>>>> Muthusamy [isolatedn@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:21 AM
>>>>> To: ALAC Internal List
>>>>> Cc: Bart Boswinkel; Tina Dam; idn-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Track
>>>>> Proposal v3
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello CLO
>>>>>
>>>>> The revised draft incorporating comments is due tomorrow (9th July) and
>>>>> the
>>>>> statement has to go to alac vote tomorrow. Apart from incorporating
>>>>> comments, should any of the nine points need to be DELETED ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please advise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>>>>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>>>>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>>>>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Tina
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The points raised in point 7,8,9 in the ALAC draft comment in
>>>>>>
>>>>> reference to
>>>>>
>>>>>> the absence of links to documents etc. are general, minor
>>>>>>
>> observations,
>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>> to be taken as a suggestion for maintaining the completeness of the
>>>>>>
>>>>> draft
>>>>>
>>>>>> implementation report. It was NOT implied that this is a serious
>>>>>>
>>>>> omission,
>>>>>
>>>>>> nor implied that there was any reason for any intent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The draft comments may please NOT be seen as directed to IDN staff,
>>>>>>
>> and
>>
>>>>>> certainly there was no misunderstanding about staff / working groups
>>>>>>
>>>>> that
>>>>>
>>>>>> would have compiled the third revison of the plan on which the draft
>>>>>> comments were prepared.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>>>> IDN liaision.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart <
>>>>>> nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear IDN Working Group and ALAC members:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tina Dan at ICANN had a look at the draft statement, and thought I
>>>>>>>
>>>>> should
>>>>>
>>>>>>> advise you of the following, which she thinks may be a
>>>>>>>
>>>>> misunderstanding:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> In 7-8-9, where it appears the ALAC is understanding the Module 7
>>>>>>>
>>>>> revision
>>>>>
>>>>>>> to be that there are no outstanding issues. In fact all outstanding
>>>>>>>
>>>>> issues
>>>>>
>>>>>>> related to financial considerations, relationship between ICANN and
>>>>>>>
>>>>> manager,
>>>>>
>>>>>>> and variant management are still outstanding, hence the supporting
>>>>>>>
>>>>> papers.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> We simply provided supporting papers as opposed to keeping these
>>>>>>>
>> long
>>
>>>>>>> discussions in Module 7.
>>>>>>> It is correct that we did not add link to the supporting papers in
>>>>>>>
>> the
>>
>>>>>>> Draft Implementation Plan. This was difficult to do because of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>> posting
>>>>>
>>>>>>> deadlines and instead we posted all papers together at:
>>>>>>> http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm
>>>>>>> I hope this is of use to you. Of course if you have any questions
>>>>>>>
>>>>> related
>>>>>
>>>>>>> to the above, I'm sure Tina would be happy to help.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nick Ashton-Hart
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Director for At-Large
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Skype:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> nashtonhart
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> ALAC-Internal mailing list
>>>>>>> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
>>
>>>>>>> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>>>>>>> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> IDN-WG mailing list
>>>>> IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.ica...
>>
>>>>> IDN WG Wiki:
>>>>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC-Internal mailing list
>> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
>>
>> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
[ALAC] [ALAC-Internal] [IDN-WG] Draft Statement on IDN Fast Trac
Hello Mohamed
Every comment is captured in the revised statement. The revised statement is
brief and in summarized points. And for convenience the necessary points are
shown in the footnote.
We don't have to assume that ICANN wouldn't read a few extra lines of inputs
from a whole community, especially when conveniently organized as main
points and foot notes.
The revised comments on this page
https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy to be read
WITHOUT the line 'With the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related
tasks, it is proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul
meeting a full day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as
inter-constituency meetings attended by invited experts, staff and finance
committees to reslove all pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way
for implementation.' as this part is to be taken up separately.
Thank you
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mohamed El Bashir wrote:
> As i have posted my comments in the Wiki, i think this statement is very
> long and could be summarized, specially the point of the IDN ccTLD ICANN
> processing cost.
> I don't think it captured the comments done myself or others in the wiki.
>
> Regards,
> Mohamed
>
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>
>> Staff should prepare the vote to go as based on the ORIGINAL version that
>> was out for internal comment i.e. WITHOUT the "With the view to
>> expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
>> proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a
>> full
>> day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency meetings
>> attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
>> pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
>>
>>
>> What we can do to encourage focus on, and commitment to, implementation
>> as
>> a main theme at the Seoul meeting is to put such a proposal into the
>> introduction and cover message sent with the reviewed and voted on text...
>> Particularly as the author of a draft statement Suva we must avoid the
>> temptation of adding more text just prior to a vote process lest the whole
>> thing end up being delayed if objections are raised... I can however
>> state
>> the additional text as a recommendation or proposal from our IDN Liaison
>> (with whatever support or modification the ALAC wishes to give to it) as
>> an
>> annex to rather than part of the endorsed for vote statement text)
>>
>> Apologies for any lack of context, conciseness or grammar here but I'm on
>> some major pain killers at the moment after minor surgery and have sat too
>> long looking at my email...
>>
>> Vanda as Acting ALAC Chair at the moment if this makes no sense to you and
>> the others please over-ride or alter till it does but we need to get the
>> VOTE started ASAP to stay on schedule...
>>
>> CLO
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/7/10 Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> While incorporating comments in the draft comment statement, in the
>>> context
>>> of "ALAC raises the following comments with a view to contribute to the
>>> process of evolving the Plan further as a complete Plan so as to ensure
>>> that
>>> IDN TLDs are smoothly implemented globally without technical or policy
>>> related implementation issues and seamlessly integrated in the domain
>>> name
>>> system. At the same time ALAC empathizes that all that needs to be
>>> examined
>>> needs to be examined expeditiously as expressed in the opinion within
>>> that
>>> 'Fast-track IDN ccTLDs must be implemented as planned, i.e. in Q4 of 2009
>>> as
>>> the latest, to meet the "pressing need" of non-ASCII user community", I
>>> have
>>> added the following statement contextually.
>>>
>>> "With the view to expeditiously complete the IDN related tasks, it is
>>> proposed that ICANN incorporates in its agenda for the Seoul meeting a
>>> full
>>> day of meetings to focus on IDNs, scheduled as inter-constituency
>>> meetings
>>> attended by invited experts, staff and finance committees to resolve all
>>> pending issues related to IDN Policy and pave way for implementation."
>>>
>>> The statement with changes is at page
>>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy. Apart
>>> from
>>> non-substantive, structural changes in the process of merging comments
>>> with
>>> the original draft comment statement, the above addition related to
>>> focused
>>> inter-constituency meetings on IDN TLDs at the next ICANN meeting is an
>>> important addition that DID NOT form part of the draft comment while it
>>> was
>>> open for alac comments during the last 7 days. Added contextually to
>>> reconcile the need for urgency and the necessity for the required further
>>> work.
>>>
>>> I hope this is permissible post comment period, and be accepted as part
>>> of
>>> the statement to vote.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello CLO,
>>>>
>>>> I have incorporate the comments and prepared a more concise comment as
>>>>
>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>
>>>> ALAC comment on the 3rd revision of the Draft Implementation Plan for
>>>> IDN
>>>> ccTLDs. This is at page
>>>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy.
>>>>
>>>> By a copy of this message to staff I am requesting that this may please
>>>>
>>>>
>>> be
>>>
>>>
>>>> copied to the alac docs page and anywhere else as may be required or
>>>>
>>>>
>>> emailed
>>>
>>>
>>>> to initiate the voting process.
>>>>
>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>>>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Mathias,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will work on this today. And send you a revision incorporating comments
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> in
>>>
>>>
>>>> a few hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>>>>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>>>>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthias Langenegger <
>>>>> matthias.langenegger@icann.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Siva,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the At-Large Policy Development schedule, the final draft
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> of
>>>
>>>
>>>> the At-Large Comment on the Draft Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Fast
>>>
>>>
>>>> Track Process Revision 3 is due today. Did you receive a response to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> your
>>>
>>>
>>>> Email from Wednesday and did you have a chance to revise the Draft
>>>>>> Statement? As soon as we receive the final Draft Statement from you we
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> will
>>>
>>>
>>>> start the ALAC vote on the document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias Langenegger
>>>>>> At-Large Coordination Officer
>>>>>> Internet Association for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>>> Phone: +41 79 644 65 35
>>>>>> Skype: matthiaslangenegger
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>> From: idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [
>>>>>> idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian
>>>>>> Muthusamy [isolatedn@gmail.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:21 AM
>>>>>> To: ALAC Internal List
>>>>>> Cc: Bart Boswinkel; Tina Dam; idn-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Statement on IDN Fast
>>>>>> Track
>>>>>> Proposal v3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello CLO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The revised draft incorporating comments is due tomorrow (9th July)
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> statement has to go to alac vote tomorrow. Apart from incorporating
>>>>>> comments, should any of the nine points need to be DELETED ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please advise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>>>> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>>>>>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <
>>>>>> isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Tina
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The points raised in point 7,8,9 in the ALAC draft comment in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> reference to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the absence of links to documents etc. are general, minor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> observations,
>>>
>>>
>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to be taken as a suggestion for maintaining the completeness of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> draft
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> implementation report. It was NOT implied that this is a serious
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> omission,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nor implied that there was any reason for any intent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The draft comments may please NOT be seen as directed to IDN staff,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>
>>>
>>>> certainly there was no misunderstanding about staff / working groups
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> would have compiled the third revison of the plan on which the draft
>>>>>>> comments were prepared.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
>>>>>>> IDN liaision.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart <
>>>>>>> nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear IDN Working Group and ALAC members:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tina Dan at ICANN had a look at the draft statement, and thought I
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> advise you of the following, which she thinks may be a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> misunderstanding:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In 7-8-9, where it appears the ALAC is understanding the Module 7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> revision
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to be that there are no outstanding issues. In fact all outstanding
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> related to financial considerations, relationship between ICANN and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> manager,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and variant management are still outstanding, hence the supporting
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> papers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We simply provided supporting papers as opposed to keeping these
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> long
>>>
>>>
>>>> discussions in Module 7.
>>>>>>>> It is correct that we did not add link to the supporting papers in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>
>>>
>>>> Draft Implementation Plan. This was difficult to do because of the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> posting
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> deadlines and instead we posted all papers together at:
>>>>>>>> http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm
>>>>>>>> I hope this is of use to you. Of course if you have any questions
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to the above, I'm sure Tina would be happy to help.
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nick Ashton-Hart
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Director for At-Large
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Skype:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nashtonhart
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> ALAC-Internal mailing list
>>>>>>>> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
>>>
>>>
>>>> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>>>>>>>> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> IDN-WG mailing list
>>>>>> IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.ica...
>>>
>>>
>>>> IDN WG Wiki:
>>>>>> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC-Internal mailing list
>>> ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-li...
>>>
>>> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>>> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann...
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac